<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Sydney &#187; PR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seosyd.com/category/pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seosyd.com</link>
	<description>Free Search Engine Optimization Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Get Your Own .Edu Blog for $35/month</title>
		<link>http://www.seosyd.com/2007/12/27/get-your-own-edu-blog-for-35month/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seosyd.com/2007/12/27/get-your-own-edu-blog-for-35month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seosyd.com/2007/12/27/get-your-own-edu-blog-for-35month/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alison University seems to have taken advantage of the perception that .edu links are worth a fair bit of $$$.
You&#8217;ll often notice that .edu sites have pretty good PR because they&#8217;re seen to be &#8220;more trusted&#8221; with Google.
Alison offers a blog at her .edu for $35 a month or $320 a year.
Not recommended.

Powered by ScribeFire.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.adison.edu/">Alison University</a> seems to have taken advantage of the perception that .edu links are worth a fair bit of $$$.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll often notice that .edu sites have pretty good PR because they&#8217;re seen to be &#8220;more trusted&#8221; with Google.</p>
<p>Alison offers a blog at her .edu for $35 a month or $320 a year.</p>
<p>Not recommended.</p>
<p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seosyd.com/2007/12/27/get-your-own-edu-blog-for-35month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Selling PR7 Links For $10,000!</title>
		<link>http://www.seosyd.com/2007/12/27/google-selling-pr7-links-for-10000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seosyd.com/2007/12/27/google-selling-pr7-links-for-10000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seosyd.com/2007/12/27/google-selling-pr7-links-for-10000/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it looks like Google&#8217;s at it again, being hypocritical &#38; selling its high PR page for $10k.
This is interesting given that Matt Cutts hates paid links

As long as we’re talking about links, this seems like a pretty good
opportunity to talk about a simple litmus test for paid links and how
to tell if a paid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it looks like Google&#8217;s at it again, being hypocritical &amp; selling its <a href="http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2007/02/23/google-selling-pr7-links-for-10000/">high PR page for $10k</a>.</p>
<p>This is interesting given that <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/">Matt Cutts</a> <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/hidden-links/">hates paid links</a></p>
<p><em></em><em><br />
<blockquote>As long as we’re talking about links, this seems like a pretty good<br />
opportunity to talk about a simple litmus test for paid links and how<br />
to tell if a paid link violates search engines’ quality guidelines. If<br />
you want to sell a link, you should at least provide machine-readable<br />
disclosure for paid links by making your link in a way that doesn’t<br />
affect search engines. &#8230; I wanted to give a heads-up because Google<br />
is going to be looking at paid links more closely in the future.</p></blockquote>
<p></em>Further, on Google&#8217;s Checkout, they&#8217;re profiling their own clients on their <a href="http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:http%3A%2F%2Fgooglecheckout.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F07%2Fgolfballscom-scores-with-google-product.html">PR8 site</a>. Here&#8217;s the quote:<br />
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p><em><br />
<blockquote>In addition, Google Checkout helps make it even easier for consumers to find us when they search for items like <a href="http://www.golfballs.com/PB1512/Titleist-Pro-V1-Golf-Balls.html">Titleist Pro V1 Golf Balls</a> by displaying the Google Checkout badge next to our search results.</p></blockquote>
<p></em>I&#8217;m sure Titleist would be pleased with that! That&#8217;s got to be worth well over $1,000 in value!</p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seosyd.com/2007/12/27/google-selling-pr7-links-for-10000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
